Ram Felix Rengel, Jr.


Personal, Wednesday, 21 December 2005


Making Christ the Reason for Celebrating the Season

It has been a very hectic three days for me. A lot of problems have arisen during this span of time. But I will be sharing with you those stuff some other time. I want to share it to you when I have already consulted the parties involved in the debacle so that it would be interesting

For now, let me share with you something related to the Christmas season. You see, I got hold of an email sent to me by Mr. Marino B. Bual of Hillsboro, Oregon.

I am reprinting the whole email text below and some of my thoughts regarding this matter:

Was Jesus Born on Dec. 25? Holidays or Holy Days - Does It Matter Which Days We Keep?

Most people assume Jesus was born on Dec. 25. After all, that's the date celebrated throughout the world as the day of His birth. A careful analysis of Scripture, however, clearly indicates that Dec. 25 is an unlikely date for Christ's birth. Here are two primary reasons:

First, we know that shepherds were in the fields watching their flocks at night at the time of Jesus' birth (Luke 2:7-8). However, shepherds did not remain in the fields of Judea at night during December due to lack of forage and the bad weather. According to Celebrations: The Complete Book of American Holidays, Luke's account "suggests that Jesus may have been born in summer or early fall. Since December is cold and rainy in Judea, it is likely the shepherds would have sought shelter for their flocks at night" (p. 309).

Similarly, The Interpreter's One-Volume Commentary says this passage argues "against the birth [of Christ] occurring on Dec. 25 since the weather would not have permitted" shepherds watching over their flocks in the fields at night.

Second, Jesus' parents came to Bethlehem to register in a Roman census (Luke 2:1-4). The Romans would have known better than to have taken such a census in the dead of winter, when temperatures often dropped below freezing and roads were in poor condition for traveling. Taking a census under such conditions would have been self-defeating.

So if Jesus Christ was not born on Dec. 25, does the Bible indicate when He was born? The biblical accounts point to the autumn of the year (in the northern hemisphere) as the most likely time of Jesus' birth, based on details of the conception and birth of John the Baptist.

Since Elizabeth (John's mother) was in her sixth month of pregnancy when Jesus was conceived (Luke 1:24-36), we can determine the approximate time of year Jesus was born if we know when John was born. John's father, Zacharias, was a priest serving in the Jerusalem temple during the course of Abijah (Luke 1:5). Historical calculations indicate this course of service corresponded to June 13-19 in that year (The Companion Bible, 1974, Appendix 179, p. 200).

It was during this time of temple service that Zacharias learned that he and his wife, Elizabeth, would have a child (Luke 1:8-13). After he completed his service and traveled home, Elizabeth conceived (verses 23-24). Assuming John's conception took place near the end of June, adding nine months brings us to the end of March as the most likely time for John's birth. Adding another six months (the difference in ages between John and Jesus) brings us to the end of September as the likely time of Jesus' birth.

Although it is difficult to determine the first time anyone celebrated Dec. 25 as Christmas, historians are in general agreement that it was sometime during the fourth century.

This is an amazingly late date. Christmas was not observed in Rome, the capital of the Roman Empire, until about 300 years after Christ's death. Its origins cannot be traced back to either the teachings or practices of the earliest Christians.

Personally, I do not think it really matters when the specific date of Christ’s birth falls. The reason why we celebrate Christ’s birth is more important to me. And that is the fact that he came down from heaven, became one of us, to die on the cross to redeem us from our sins.

Christmas day has become too commercialized these days. I for one am also guilty of this. Christmas for me has become that time of the year to indulge in food (what with all the parties I have to attend) and buy stuff for me and my family. Although the latter is good, in the sense that generosity is a virtue, but sometimes the gift-giving is not done by heart anymore, as the giver also expect something in return.

I am an avid fan of Discovery Channel. There was one time, many years ago when they featured in one of their show an investigation as to the exact time when the whole Christ’s birth thing really happened. Some of the latest technologies were used to uncover the “truth.” And indeed the investigators concluded that Christ was not born on December 25. But more importantly, the conclusion did not affect me. Regardless of whether Christ was really born on December 25 or some other date, my faith remains, and I think that is the most important thing. Am I right on this?

Being preachy as it may sound, but I think we must all focus our attention to the reason for our celebrating the season, and that is Jesus Christ! Filipinos are good at this aspect because Filipinos are pious and religious by nature. I just hope that with the onslaught of Christmas-commercialism, Jesus will still remain the reason for the season for many Christmases to come.

0 Comments : Post a Comment »